In re Marriage of Rosenberger, 2024 IL App (5th) 230157-U

The case is an appeal in the dissolution of marriage between Michael Rosenberger (Petitioner-Appellee) and Dawn Rosenberger (Respondent-Appellant), heard by the Illinois Appellate Court. The appeal addresses several issues regarding the trial court's decisions made during the divorce proceedings, including property valuations, division of marital debt, calculation of income for maintenance, requirements for drug testing, and attorney fees.

Key details of the case:

1. Background: Michael and Dawn were married in 1998 and have three children, one of whom is not biologically Michael's but was treated as such. Michael filed for divorce in 2018.

2. Trial Details: The trial included multiple hearings where both parties provided testimonies related to their financial situations, assets, and parenting roles. The court had to determine the value of their marital property and debts, as well as the appropriate maintenance for Dawn.

3. Court's Findings:
- The court valued Michael's bank accounts and a 2015 Dodge 2500 truck. Dawn contested these valuations, claiming they were not reflective of true value, but the appellate court found them to be supported by evidence.
- The division of marital debt was challenged by Dawn, who argued that the court's allocation was not equitable, but again, the court's decision was upheld as not arbitrary.
- Michael's gross income was a point of contention, as Dawn believed it was miscalculated. However, the court's finding was supported and upheld.
- Dawn was ordered to submit to quarterly drug testing due to her history of substance abuse, which she claimed was inappropriately imposed. The appellate court found the requirement justifiable given the circumstances.
- Dawn's request for the payment of her attorney fees by Michael was denied, with the court noting Dawn had sufficient potential income and assets to cover her fees, and that the complexity of the case did not warrant the additional request.

4. Outcome: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decisions on all contested issues, stating that none were against the manifest weight of the evidence nor constituted an abuse of discretion.

In conclusion, the appellate court upheld the trial court's comprehensive findings and orders related to the dissolution of marriage, reflecting a careful consideration of the evidence presented during the trial.