Illinois Appellate Court

In re Marriage of Dalzell, 2025 IL App (2d) 240658-U

Contempt Requires Willful Disobedience of Clear Order

November 17, 2025
Marriage
Quick Answer

Illinois appellate court affirmed denial of contempt petition where father failed to prove mother willfully violated dissolution judgment regarding medical expense reimbursement. Court applied willful noncompliance standard, finding residential treatment costs were recreational, not medical. Practitioners must draft precise expense definitions in dissolution orders.

Citation: N/A Court: Illinois Appellate Court Date: November 17, 2025

Facts

Jennifer Dalzell (Johnson) and Steven Dalzell divorced with a judgment allocating medical expenses 40% to Jennifer, 60% to Steven. Steven sought contempt when Jennifer refused to reimburse him for transportation and residential treatment facility costs for their child. The trial court denied the contempt petition and Steven appealed.

Issue

Whether petitioner willfully disobeyed the dissolution judgment by failing to reimburse respondent for transportation and residential program fees claimed as medical expenses.

Holding

The appellate court affirmed denial of the contempt petition, finding respondent failed to prove petitioner willfully disobeyed a clear, unequivocal order. The treatment program costs were deemed recreational rather than medical expenses, and required advance notice was not provided.

Key Reasoning

  • Contempt requires proof of clear, unequivocal command and willful noncompliance
  • Treatment programs contained recreational elements (skiing, yoga, chef meals, game rooms) that undermined medical necessity characterization
  • Judgment's 14-day advance notice provision is substantive and failure to comply can forfeit reimbursement rights
  • Subsequent court orders changing arrangements undercut the clarity of original contempt claim

Practical Impact

For Petitioners

Draft dissolution orders with precise definitions of medical vs. recreational expenses and require pre-approval procedures with clinical documentation

For Respondents

Challenge contempt by demonstrating order ambiguity, lack of proper notice, or recreational nature of disputed expenses

When This Applies

Applies when treatment includes recreational elements; distinguishable when expenses are purely medical with proper advance notice

Full Opinion Download the official PDF

Facing a Similar Legal Issue?

Appellate decisions shape family law strategy. Ensure your approach aligns with the latest precedents.

Schedule a Strategy Session

Legal Assistant

Ask specific questions about this case's holding.

Disclaimer: This AI analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify any AI-generated content against the official court opinion.
Call Book