Illinois Appellate Court

In re Marriage of May, 2025 IL App (5th) 241179-U

Unresolved Contempt Petition Prevents Final Appealable Order

September 29, 2025
Marriage
Quick Answer

Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because unresolved petition for rule to show cause prevented final appealable order. Illinois requires all pending post-judgment motions be disposed of before appeal unless Rule 304(a) certification obtained. Practitioners must ensure complete finality.

Citation: N/A Court: Illinois Appellate Court Date: September 29, 2025

Facts

William and Amy May divorced, with subsequent dispute over pension allocation. Amy filed petition for rule to show cause on April 2, 2024, and trial court issued August 29, 2024 docket entry on pension period but did not resolve the contempt petition. Amy appealed the pension ruling.

Issue

Whether the appellate court had jurisdiction to review the trial court's pension allocation order when an unresolved petition for rule to show cause remained pending.

Holding

The appellate court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the trial court's pension ruling did not dispose of Amy's pending petition for rule to show cause, creating no final appealable order. Without Rule 304(a) certification, the court could not exercise jurisdiction over the interlocutory pension decision.

Key Reasoning

  • Only final orders or those meeting narrow Rule 304 exceptions are appealable under Illinois law
  • Unresolved contempt/rule-to-show-cause petitions prevent finality absent express disposition
  • Court followed In re Marriage of Gutman precedent requiring complete resolution of all pending matters
  • Appellate courts must consider jurisdiction sua sponte and dismiss when finality lacking

Practical Impact

For Petitioners

Obtain explicit written orders disposing of all pending motions and petitions before appealing, or request Rule 304(a) certification for immediate appeal of specific issues

For Respondents

Challenge appellate jurisdiction by identifying any unresolved petitions or motions that prevent finality of the appealed order

When This Applies

Applies when any post-judgment petition remains unresolved; does not apply when all matters explicitly granted, denied, or dismissed with Rule 304(a) certification

Citation Network

This Case Cites

  • In re Marriage of Gutman
Full Opinion Download the official PDF

Facing a Similar Legal Issue?

Appellate decisions shape family law strategy. Ensure your approach aligns with the latest precedents.

Schedule a Strategy Session

Legal Assistant

Ask specific questions about this case's holding.

Disclaimer: This AI analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify any AI-generated content against the official court opinion.
Call Book