Illinois Appellate Court

In re Marriage of Vician, 2025 IL App (3d) 240493-U

Retirement Account Valuation Upheld Despite Payment Schedule

August 26, 2025
PropertyProtection Orders
Quick Answer

Trial court's valuation of retirement account affirmed under manifest weight standard. Court properly credited CPA's document-based calculations over party estimates and reasonably ordered $50/month installments based on respondent's limited financial circumstances. Thorough documentation and expert testimony crucial for retirement asset valuations.

Citation: N/A Court: Illinois Appellate Court Date: August 26, 2025

Facts

Gary and Kathleen Vician divorced with dispute over valuation of Kathleen's 403(b) retirement account and payment terms. Trial court awarded Gary $16,343.81 (accounting for taxes) to be paid in $50/month installments. Gary appealed both the valuation amount and installment payment structure.

Issue

Whether the trial court erred in valuing petitioner's marital interest in respondent's 403(b) account and ordering installment payments rather than lump sum.

Holding

Affirmed. Trial court properly credited CPA's detailed calculations based on actual account statements over petitioner's estimates. Installment payment schedule was within court's discretion given respondent's limited retirement income and outstanding debts.

Key Reasoning

  • Factual findings reviewed for manifest weight of evidence standard; property distribution reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • Court properly credited CPA Graham's document-based calculations over petitioner's estimate-based computation
  • Tax consequences properly addressed using petitioner's testified 28% tax rate for 403(b) withdrawal
  • Payment schedule reasonable given respondent's retired status, limited cash flow, and outstanding obligations

Practical Impact

For Petitioners

Provide comprehensive documentary evidence and expert testimony for retirement account valuations; request lump-sum payments or offsets early in proceedings

For Respondents

Present detailed financial circumstances to support installment payment requests; use qualified experts with complete account records for valuations

When This Applies

Applies when retirement account valuation disputes involve competing methodologies; limited to non-precedential Rule 23 orders for persuasive authority only

Full Opinion Download the official PDF

Facing a Similar Legal Issue?

Appellate decisions shape family law strategy. Ensure your approach aligns with the latest precedents.

Schedule a Strategy Session

Legal Assistant

Ask specific questions about this case's holding.

Disclaimer: This AI analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify any AI-generated content against the official court opinion.
Call Book