Illinois Appellate Court

In re Marriage of Werhun, 2025 IL App (3d) 250201-U

Trial Court Must Address Income Imputation Claims

October 29, 2025
CustodyMaintenancePropertyProtection Orders
Quick Answer

The appellate court affirmed most rulings but reversed the trial court's failure to impute income to Jeffrey, requiring remand. Courts must consider earning capacity when current income appears artificially low. Attorneys should document prior earnings history and business opportunities when seeking income imputation.

Citation: N/A Court: Illinois Appellate Court Date: October 29, 2025

Facts

Erin and Jeffrey Werhun divorced with disputes over parenting time restrictions due to Jeffrey's alcohol use, maintenance calculations, and asset allocation. The trial court entered judgment, and Erin appealed multiple rulings including the court's failure to impute income to Jeffrey.

Issue

Whether the trial court erred in refusing to restrict parenting time for alcohol use, finding no cohabitation, failing to impute income, and making insufficient dissipation findings.

Holding

The appellate court affirmed the parenting time and cohabitation rulings but reversed on income imputation, finding the trial court abused its discretion. The court remanded for detailed dissipation findings due to insufficient record specificity.

Key Reasoning

  • Courts may only restrict parenting time under section 603.10 when alcohol use interferes with actual caretaking ability
  • GAL testimony showing no impairment during supervised visits supported maintaining current arrangements with monitoring
  • Prior earnings history and post-separation financial behavior supported imputing income despite current low reported income
  • Dissipation findings require specific tracing and detailed calculations to enable meaningful appellate review

Practical Impact

For Petitioners

Develop comprehensive evidentiary records for substance abuse claims including impairment documentation, and preserve detailed financial records showing spouse's earning capacity for income imputation motions

For Respondents

Counter income imputation with evidence of genuine inability to earn at prior levels, and ensure GAL testimony focuses on actual parenting performance rather than general substance use

When This Applies

This case applies when seeking income imputation based on earning capacity; it doesn't apply when current income accurately reflects actual earning ability

Statutes Cited

Full Opinion Download the official PDF

Facing a Similar Legal Issue?

Appellate decisions shape family law strategy. Ensure your approach aligns with the latest precedents.

Schedule a Strategy Session

Legal Assistant

Ask specific questions about this case's holding.

Disclaimer: This AI analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify any AI-generated content against the official court opinion.
Call Book