Illinois Appellate Court

In re Marriage of McJoynt, 2025 IL App (3d) 240447-U

Fee Waivers Can Be Lost Through Conduct

September 5, 2025
GuardianshipProtection Orders
Quick Answer

Illinois courts can require parties with fee waivers to pay guardian ad litem fees if circumstances change. Trial courts have discretion to reallocate GAL fees based on conduct and changed circumstances. Parties must object promptly to avoid waiving their fee waiver protection.

Citation: N/A Court: Illinois Appellate Court Date: September 5, 2025

Facts

Theodore McJoynt and Angela McJoynt divorced with children requiring guardian ad litem representation. Angela initially obtained a fee waiver but later hired counsel and made GAL payments. The trial court reallocated GAL fees equally between both parties despite Angela's original fee waiver.

Issue

Whether a party with a Rule 298 fee waiver can later be required to pay guardian ad litem fees after changed circumstances.

Holding

The appellate court affirmed that Angela waived her fee waiver through conduct including hiring counsel, making GAL payments, and failing to timely object. Trial courts have discretion to reallocate GAL fees when circumstances change, and laches principles apply to delayed objections.

Key Reasoning

  • GAL appointment and fee allocation are equitable matters within trial court discretion
  • Waiver by conduct occurred through hiring counsel, making payments, and failing to object promptly
  • Laches principles apply - timely objection could have allowed vacatur or different allocation
  • Fee waivers tied to self-representation don't provide indefinite immunity after circumstances change

Practical Impact

For Petitioners

Document opposing party's conduct and changed financial circumstances to support GAL fee reallocation arguments

For Respondents

Object immediately to GAL appointments if claiming fee waiver protection and avoid making any GAL payments without court direction

When This Applies

Applies when parties with fee waivers hire counsel or make payments; doesn't apply to indigent parties who maintain pro se status throughout

Statutes Cited

Full Opinion Download the official PDF

Facing a Similar Legal Issue?

Appellate decisions shape family law strategy. Ensure your approach aligns with the latest precedents.

Schedule a Strategy Session

Legal Assistant

Ask specific questions about this case's holding.

Disclaimer: This AI analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify any AI-generated content against the official court opinion.
Call Book