Illinois Appellate Court

In re Marriage of Weston, 2025 IL App (5th) 231323-U

Parenting Restrictions Upheld Despite Mother's Appeal

August 8, 2025
CustodyGuardianshipProtection Orders
Quick Answer

Illinois appellate court affirmed trial court's allocation of majority parenting time to father and plenary order of protection restricting mother's access. Court applied manifest weight of evidence standard, finding substantial support from child testimony, GAL reports, and substance abuse evidence. Practitioners must build robust evidentiary records.

Citation: N/A Court: Illinois Appellate Court Date: August 8, 2025

Facts

Brittani and Chad Weston divorced with disputes over parenting time allocation and protective orders. The trial court awarded majority parenting time to father and entered a plenary order of protection severely restricting mother's access. Mother appealed both decisions to the Fifth District.

Issue

Whether the trial court's parenting time allocation to father and plenary order of protection restricting mother were against the manifest weight of evidence.

Holding

The Fifth District affirmed both orders, finding sufficient evidentiary support. The court emphasized deference to trial court credibility determinations and factual findings when supported by substantial evidence from multiple sources.

Key Reasoning

  • Manifest weight standard requires deference to trial court's credibility assessments and factual determinations
  • Evidence included in-camera child interview describing safety concerns, documented substance abuse history, and dangerous home conditions
  • Guardian ad litem report supported father's custody and documented mother's lack of cooperation
  • Temporary orders with supervised visitation and drug testing buttressed safety findings

Practical Impact

For Petitioners

Build comprehensive evidentiary record with GAL reports, child testimony, medical records, and corroborating witnesses to support custody modifications

For Respondents

Challenge credibility and highlight evidentiary gaps at trial level since appellate review is highly deferential to trial court findings

When This Applies

Applies when substantial evidence supports safety concerns; less relevant in cases lacking documented substance abuse or child testimony

Full Opinion Download the official PDF

Facing a Similar Legal Issue?

Appellate decisions shape family law strategy. Ensure your approach aligns with the latest precedents.

Schedule a Strategy Session

Legal Assistant

Ask specific questions about this case's holding.

Disclaimer: This AI analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify any AI-generated content against the official court opinion.
Call Book