Illinois Appellate Court

In re Marriage of Kehoe, 2025 IL App (1st) 241270-U

Foreign Marriage Elections Need Contractual Intent

August 4, 2025
Property
Quick Answer

The Illinois Appellate Court held that mandatory foreign marriage document elections do not automatically constitute enforceable property agreements under Illinois law. Courts require proof of mutual intent to create contractual obligations regarding divorce property division, not just administrative compliance with foreign requirements.

Citation: N/A Court: Illinois Appellate Court Date: August 4, 2025

Facts

James Kehoe and Lilia Garavaglia married in Italy and elected "separation of assets" on their Italian Atto di Matrimonio as required by Italian law. During their Illinois divorce proceedings, Kehoe argued this election constituted a binding agreement excluding property from marital classification under Illinois law.

Issue

Whether a mandatory foreign marriage document election constitutes an enforceable contract excluding property from Illinois marital property division under IMDMA §503(a)(4).

Holding

The Italian marriage document election did not constitute an enforceable contract under Illinois law. The court found no meeting of the minds to treat the mandatory Italian selection as a contractual agreement governing asset disposition upon divorce.

Key Reasoning

  • Administrative foreign elections in marriage instruments are not automatically contractual agreements under Illinois law
  • Trial court properly received parol evidence to determine parties' intent and found insufficient evidence of mutual assent
  • Foreign law must be pleaded and proved with competent evidence, not assumed through judicial notice
  • Enforceability requires affirmative proof that parties intended to create contractual property rights upon divorce

Practical Impact

For Petitioners

Must prove clear mutual intent and contractual assent when relying on foreign marriage document elections as property agreements

For Respondents

Can challenge enforceability by demonstrating lack of meeting of minds and administrative nature of foreign requirements

When This Applies

Applies to mandatory foreign administrative elections; distinguishable from clearly executed prenuptial agreements with explicit divorce property provisions

Statutes Cited

Full Opinion Download the official PDF

Facing a Similar Legal Issue?

Appellate decisions shape family law strategy. Ensure your approach aligns with the latest precedents.

Schedule a Strategy Session

Legal Assistant

Ask specific questions about this case's holding.

Disclaimer: This AI analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify any AI-generated content against the official court opinion.
Call Book