Understanding the Implications of Court to Hear Cases on Arbitration, Where One Can Be Tried for an Offense in Illinois: Complete Guide

Summary

Core Legal Insight:

Illinois courts maintain exclusive jurisdiction over criminal offenses—which cannot be arbitrated—while civil claims arising from the same underlying conduct (such as fraud or embezzlement) may proceed through contractual arbitration simultaneously. This jurisdictional split means arbitration outcomes provide no protection against subsequent criminal prosecution, and parties must navigate parallel proceedings with fundamentally different evidentiary standards and procedural protections.

🔒 Security Note: Protecting sensitive family information is critical. Learn how SteeleFortress helps law firms and families safeguard their digital assets.


Can You Navigate This Yourself? Courts sometimes intervene in arbitration matters involving potential offenses. This requires careful consideration. You may handle basic research if:
Your situation involves a straightforward civil dispute with no criminal allegations
Both parties agree on the arbitration process and scope
No regulatory violations or fraud claims complicate your case
You understand the differences between arbitration and criminal proceedings
When to Hire an Attorney Immediately:
Your arbitration dispute involves conduct that could trigger criminal charges
You face allegations of fraud, embezzlement, or regulatory violations
The opposing party challenges whether your matter can legally be arbitrated
You need to understand how arbitration outcomes might affect potential prosecution
Complex business disputes intersect with potential offense allegations
Phase 1: The Critical Distinction—Why This Matters for Your Case (Weeks 1-2)
What Happens: Arbitration serves civil disputes exclusively. Criminal offenses remain within the court system's jurisdiction. These two worlds often collide in unexpected ways.
Consider a business partner accused of diverting company funds. This scenario triggers two separate tracks. First, a civil arbitration claim for breach of fiduciary duty. Second, potential criminal prosecution for theft. Understanding how courts navigate these overlapping matters shapes your entire legal strategy.
Key Deadline: Statute of limitations varies by claim type—typically 5 years for written contracts in Illinois
Common Delay: Parties failing to recognize the dual civil-criminal nature of their dispute
Phase 2: Challenging Arbitrability—Can Your Matter Be Arbitrated? (Weeks 3-8)
What Happens: Courts serve as gatekeepers first. They determine whether a dispute belongs in arbitration. This threshold question carries enormous consequences for offense-related matters.
Key scenarios where courts step in:
☐ Criminal offenses are categorically non-arbitrable—the state maintains exclusive prosecution authority
☐ Civil matters carrying penal consequences face heightened scrutiny
☐ Disputes involving regulatory violations with both civil and criminal dimensions
☐ Cases where public interest demands court oversight rather than private resolution
Real-world example: A construction company discovers their project manager submitted falsified invoices. The total reaches $200,000. The company wants quick resolution through their contractual arbitration clause. However, the conduct also constitutes criminal fraud. The court must decide: Can the civil breach-of-contract claim proceed in arbitration? Meanwhile, the state may pursue criminal charges separately.
Key Deadline: Motion to compel arbitration must be filed within 30 days of answer (Illinois Supreme Court Rule 181)
Pro Tip: Document all evidence of the alleged conduct before initiating any proceedings
Phase 3: Discovery and Evidence Gathering (Months 3-6)
What Happens:
Exchange interrogatories (written questions under oath)
Request production of documents from opposing party
Conduct depositions (sworn testimony)
Retain expert witnesses if needed
Key Deadlines:
Interrogatory responses: 28 days (Illinois Supreme Court Rule 213)
Document production: 28 days
Discovery cutoff: 90 days before trial (varies by county)
Evidence Standard Disparities: Arbitration typically applies the "preponderance of evidence" standard. This means "more likely than not." Criminal proceedings require proof "beyond reasonable doubt." This dramatic difference matters greatly. Conduct found actionable in arbitration might not support criminal conviction. The reverse is also true.
Cybersecurity Note: Store all arbitration documents securely with encryption. Never discuss case details on social media. Statements may be discoverable in both proceedings.
Phase 4: Enforcement and Setting Aside Arbitration Awards (Months 6-8)
What to understand: Even after arbitration concludes, courts retain review authority. This is especially true when awards touch on conduct that could constitute an offense.
Grounds for court intervention include:
Awards that violate fundamental public policy principles
Findings involving fraudulent conduct or criminal behavior
Situations where arbitrators exceeded their authority on offense-related matters
Cases where proper due process protections were absent
Real-world example: An arbitrator awards damages against a financial advisor. The underlying issue: unauthorized trading. The losing party challenges the award. They argue the conduct constitutes securities fraud—a criminal offense. Therefore, the arbitrator lacked jurisdiction. Making findings that essentially determine criminal culpability exceeded their authority.
Success Rate: 70-80% of arbitration challenges are unsuccessful when awards follow proper procedures
Phase 5: Navigating Hybrid Situations—Civil and Criminal Overlap (Months 9-12)
The complexity intensifies when identical conduct triggers both civil liability and criminal exposure. Civil matters are arbitrable. Criminal matters are not. These hybrid situations demand careful strategic planning.
Common hybrid scenarios you might encounter:
☐ Fraud allegations in commercial contracts
☐ Embezzlement claims against employees or partners
☐ Regulatory violations carrying both fines and potential prosecution
☐ Intellectual property theft with criminal dimensions
☐ Environmental violations subject to civil penalties and criminal sanctions
Real-world example: A healthcare company discovers a vendor problem. The vendor submitted false Medicare billing documentation. The vendor contract contains an arbitration clause. The company can pursue civil damages through arbitration. However, the false claims potentially violate federal criminal statutes. Both proceedings may advance simultaneously. The standards and consequences differ dramatically.
Phase 6: Critical Implications for Your Legal Strategy (Ongoing)
Due Process Protections: Criminal matters demand constitutional safeguards. These include the right to counsel and confrontation of witnesses. Proof must reach "beyond reasonable doubt." Arbitration simply does not provide these protections. Courts recognize this fundamental gap when evaluating offense-related matters.
State Prosecution Authority: The government's power to prosecute offenses cannot be delegated. Private arbitration tribunals cannot assume this role. This principle protects public interests. It ensures accountability for conduct that harms society, not just individual parties.
Double Jeopardy Considerations: Arbitration outcomes generally do not prevent subsequent criminal prosecution. Winning in arbitration provides no shield. The state may still pursue charges for the same underlying conduct.
Illinois-Specific Requirements
Before proceeding, verify your situation meets Illinois requirements:
☐ Illinois Uniform Arbitration Act (710 ILCS 5/) governs arbitration procedures
☐ Illinois courts maintain supervisory authority over arbitration awards
☐ Criminal matters remain exclusively within Illinois state court jurisdiction
☐ Federal arbitration law may preempt state law in interstate commerce situations
Timeline Variables That Extend the Process
Court backlog: Cook County delays can add 3-6 months
Complex discovery: Digital forensics and hidden assets add 2-4 months
High conflict: Multiple motions extend timeline by 4-8 months
Appeals: Add 12-18 months if appealed to higher court
Parallel criminal proceedings: Highly variable, potentially years
Costs and Timeline Expectations
Understanding the financial implications:
Arbitration filing fees: $200-$2,000 depending on forum and claim amount
Arbitrator fees: $300-$700 per hour, typically shared between parties
Legal representation: Essential for offense-related matters
Court intervention motions: Filing fees of $250-$500 in Cook County
Timeline summary:
Standard arbitration: 6-12 months to resolution
Arbitration with court challenges: 12-24 months or longer
Parallel criminal proceedings: Highly variable, potentially years
Protecting Yourself Throughout the Process
Use encrypted file sharing to send sensitive documents to your attorney
Understand that arbitration testimony could potentially be used in criminal proceedings
Consult with both civil and criminal defense counsel when offense allegations arise
Document all communications carefully and maintain organized records
Never attempt informal service via email or text unless court-approved
WARNING: This guide provides educational information only. The intersection of arbitration and criminal law creates complex legal territory. Even straightforward disputes can escalate rapidly. Offense allegations change everything. Consult with qualified Illinois legal counsel before making strategic decisions.
Timelines vary based on your unique situation. When your arbitration matter involves potential offense allegations, professional guidance becomes essential. Many Illinois attorneys offer initial consultations. They can assess your situation's complexity. They help you understand the implications of court involvement in your arbitration case.

Written by Jonathan D. Steele

Chicago divorce attorney with cybersecurity certifications (Security+, CEH, ISC2). Illinois Super Lawyers Rising Star 2016-2025.

Free Consultation

For more insights, read our Divorce Decoded blog.