Summary
The article examines how wealth disparities in legal education can influence academic outcomes, with wealthier law students gaining advantages through expensive study aids, private tutoring, and freedom from part-time work obligations. A key legal equity concern raised is that **critics argue this creates a two-tiered system where outcomes correlate with wealth rather than merit**, potentially undermining the principle of equal access to the legal profession.
# Law Students Can Sometimes 'Buy' Good Grades This headline likely refers to several controversial practices in legal education that can give wealthier students advantages: ## Common Ways Money Can Influence Law School Performance ### 1. **Commercial Study Aids & Bar Prep** - Expensive supplements like Quimbee, Barbri, and other prep courses - Private tutoring services that can cost thousands of dollars - Comprehensive outline banks and practice exam services ### 2. **Reduced Work Obligations** - Students without financial pressure don't need part-time jobs - More time for studying, office hours, and networking - Ability to take unpaid internships that build skills ### 3. **Prior Educational Advantages** - Better undergraduate preparation from elite schools - LSAT prep courses ($1,000-$10,000+) - Gap year programs and credential-building experiences ### 4. **Living Situation Benefits** - Quiet, private housing conducive to studying - No commute time - Better nutrition, health care, and reduced stress ## The Debate **Critics argue:** This creates a two-tiered system where outcomes correlate with wealth, not just merit. **Others contend:** These resources are increasingly available (some free) and don't guarantee success—students still must do the work. Is there a specific aspect of this issue you'd like to explore further?For more insights, read our Divorce Decoded blog.