Summary
Article Overview: How This Helps Divorcing Clients: Choosing the right court-approved video platform protects your parenting time by creating an unalterable record of every call made, missed, or cut short—giving you documented proof if the other parent fails to comply with the parenting plan. This strategic platform selection positions you as the organized, child-focused parent while simultaneously holding your co-parent accountable, which directly influences how judges evaluate parental responsibility allocation.
Quick Answer: The opposing counsel is already on the back foot—because they haven't figured out that your client's choice of video platform for parenting time is now a discovery goldmine.
The opposing counsel is already on the back foot—because they haven't figured out that your client's choice of video platform for parenting time is now a discovery goldmine. While they're still debating Zoom versus FaceTime like it's 2019, you're positioning your client as the technologically competent, court-compliant parent who takes digital communication seriously.
Why Courts Care About Your Video Platform
Illinois courts don't issue parenting plans with vague instructions to "video chat sometimes." Judges want specificity. They want accountability. And increasingly, they want to know that the platform you're using won't become the next battlefield in your custody dispute.
Court-approved video communication platforms serve a singular purpose: facilitating meaningful virtual parenting time while creating a verifiable record that neither party can manipulate. This isn't about convenience—it's about control. The parent who understands this distinction gains immediate strategic advantage.
The Platform Breakdown: What Actually Works in Court
Dedicated Co-Parenting Platforms
Applications specifically designed for divorced or separated parents—such as OurFamilyWizard, TalkingParents, and AppClose—offer features that consumer apps simply cannot match.
Strategic Advantages:
- Unalterable message logs that courts accept as evidence without authentication battles
- Built-in scheduling tools that document every modification request and response
- Video call logging with timestamps—proof your client showed up, proof the other party didn't
- Professional tone enforcement: harder to send hostile messages when you know a judge might read them
- Some platforms offer direct court access, allowing judges or guardians ad litem to review communications in real-time
Strategic Limitations:
- Monthly subscription costs that opposing counsel will weaponize if your client balks at paying
- Learning curve that technologically resistant parties will use as an excuse for non-compliance
- Requires both parties to participate—useless if the other parent refuses to download the app
- Some platforms have video quality issues that can undermine the parenting time experience
Consumer Video Platforms (Zoom, FaceTime, Google Meet, Skype)
These are the platforms everyone already knows—which is precisely why they're both convenient and dangerous.
Strategic Advantages:
- Zero learning curve means no excuses for technical incompetence
- Free or low-cost options eliminate financial objections
- High-quality video and audio that actually allows meaningful parent-child interaction
- Cross-platform compatibility—works on phones, tablets, computers
- Familiar interface reduces child anxiety during calls
Strategic Limitations:
- No automatic documentation—if your client doesn't screenshot that missed call, it didn't happen
- Easy to manipulate: deleted call logs, claims of "technical difficulties," blocked numbers
- No court integration—you'll need to authenticate any evidence the hard way
- Privacy concerns if either parent's account security is compromised
- Recording calls without consent raises wiretapping issues under Illinois law
The Cyber-Family Law Intersection Your Opposition Ignores
Here's where the real leverage lives: platform choice reveals digital competence. And digital competence—or the lack thereof—is discoverable.
A parent who can't figure out OurFamilyWizard is the same parent who probably has unsecured devices, shared passwords with new partners, and a social media presence that contradicts their sworn testimony. A parent who refuses to use a court-ordered platform is a parent in contempt—and contempt findings have teeth.
Conversely, your client's meticulous use of approved platforms demonstrates exactly the kind of organizational capacity and child-focused decision-making that judges reward in allocation of parental responsibilities.
Platform Selection as Litigation Strategy
Stop treating video platform selection as a throwaway paragraph in your parenting plan. Consider these tactical applications:
- For the organized client: Insist on a dedicated co-parenting platform. Your client's compliance will be automatic; the other parent's failures will be documented.
- For the client with a difficult co-parent: Request court-monitored access to communication logs. Nothing changes behavior faster than judicial oversight.
- For the client facing alienation concerns: Demand specific platform requirements with automatic logging. Missed calls become evidence. Shortened calls become patterns.
- For the high-income client: Platform costs are irrelevant. Use premium features that create the most comprehensive record possible.
What Judges Actually Want to See
Illinois courts evaluating virtual parenting time look for evidence that both parents are facilitating—not just tolerating—the child's relationship with the other parent. The platform you choose signals your client's intentions before a single call is made.
A parent who proposes a structured, documented communication system is a parent who wants accountability. A parent who insists on informal arrangements is often a parent who wants deniability.
Make sure your client is on the right side of that distinction.
The Bottom Line
Your opposition is still treating video parenting time as a minor logistical detail. That's their mistake—and your opportunity. The platform battle is won before the first hearing when you've already positioned your client as the parent who takes court orders seriously, documents everything, and facilitates the child's relationship with both parents.
The other side can catch up. But by then, the record will already tell the story you want the judge to hear.
Your parenting plan deserves the same strategic precision as every other aspect of your case. Schedule a consultation with Steele Family Law and stop leaving leverage on the table.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Illinois courts determine custody (parental responsibilities)?
Illinois uses the 'best interests of the child' standard under 750 ILCS 5/602.7. Courts evaluate 17 statutory factors including each parent's willingness to facilitate the child's relationship with the other parent, the child's adjustment to home and school, and the mental and physical health of all parties.
What is the difference between decision-making and parenting time?
Illinois law separates parental responsibilities into two components: decision-making (major choices about education, health, religion, and extracurriculars) and parenting time (the physical schedule). Parents can share decision-making equally while having different parenting time schedules.
Can I modify custody if circumstances change?
Yes, under 750 ILCS 5/610. You must show a substantial change in circumstances affecting the child's best interests. Common triggers include parental relocation, change in work schedule, domestic violence, substance abuse, or the child's changing needs as they age.
Written by Jonathan D. Steele
Chicago divorce attorney with cybersecurity certifications (Security+, ISC2 CC, Google Cybersecurity Professional Certificate). Illinois Super Lawyers Rising Star 2016-2025.
Free Case AssessmentFor more insights, read our Divorce Decoded blog.