In the case In re Marriage of Darlena Erickson n/k/a Darlena Gomez v. Cody Erickson, the Appellate Court of Illinois upheld a lower court's decision regarding the relocation of minor children following the dissolution of their parents' marriage. Darlena Gomez (petitioner) sought to relocate with her children from Bourbonnais to St. Charles, approximately 75 miles away from Cody Erickson (respondent), who opposed the relocation. After a hearing, the circuit court denied Gomez’s petition and modified the parenting plan to grant more time to respondent during the school year.
Main Legal Question: Best Interests of the Children
One of the key legal questions in this case revolved around determining the best interests of the children involved, a critical factor in relocation disputes post-divorce. The court had to assess various statutory factors and weigh them against each other to make a decision that would promote the well-being of the children.
Court's Reasoning and Decision
Legal Proceedings
Initially, the appellate court found that the lower court had not properly focused on the children's best interests and remanded the case for further review. On remand, the trial court issued a new ruling, again denying the relocation request while modifying the parenting time arrangement, which Gomez appealed.
🔒 Security Note: Protecting sensitive family information is critical. Learn how SteeleFortress helps law firms and families safeguard their digital assets.
The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, concluding that the denial of the relocation was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. It examined various statutory factors related to the children's best interests, including the quality of each parent's relationship with the children, educational opportunities, and the emotional impact of the relocation. The court noted both parents were involved and dedicated, but that allowing the move would create unsustainable travel problems and disrupt the children's routines.
Legal Proceedings
Additionally, the appellate court addressed Gomez's failure to comply with statutory notice requirements for relocation, which the court deemed significant in its decision-making process. The court emphasized that, overall, the trial court’s conclusions were reasonable and balanced in light of the best interests of the children, leading to the affirmation of the circuit court's judgment.
Future Implications
- This case underscores the importance of thoroughly considering the best interests of the children in relocation disputes.
- Courts are likely to continue prioritizing stability and routine for children post-divorce, especially when relocation could significantly disrupt their lives.
- Parties involved in similar cases should ensure full compliance with statutory requirements to strengthen their legal position.
Child Support Guidelines
For potential clients navigating complex family law matters, seeking legal counsel is crucial. Contact our firm for personalized guidance and support in handling your case effectively.
For more insights, read our Divorce Decoded blog.
References
- In re Marriage of Erickson, 2019 IL App (3d) 180673
- 750 ILCS 5/609.2 - Illinois Statute on Relocation of a Child
Related Articles
- Analyzing the Case: In re Marriage of Erikson
- Analysis of In re Marriage of Erikson: A Landmark Decision on Child Relocation
- Analysis of In re Marriage of Erikson: A Critical Examination of Child Relocation Laws in Illinois
Ready to Take Control of Your Situation?
At Steele Family Law, we've helped hundreds of Illinois families navigate complex legal situations. Our approach is different:
- Transparent pricing – No surprise bills (powered by IntelliBill)
- Security-first – Your data protected by SteeleFortress cybersecurity
- Results-focused – We fight for the best possible outcome
Schedule your free consultation today. Call (847) 260-7330 or Book Online
Ready to Protect Your Family's Future?
Get strategic legal guidance from an attorney who understands both the law and technology.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I move out of state with my child after divorce in Illinois?
Only with the other parent's written consent or court approval under 750 ILCS 5/609.2. You must provide 60 days written notice including new address, moving date, reason for relocation, and proposed revised parenting schedule. Moves over 25 miles within Illinois or any out-of-state move require formal notice.
What factors do Illinois courts consider in relocation cases?
Under 750 ILCS 5/609.2(g), courts evaluate: the child's wishes, reasons for the proposed move, quality of life improvements, each parent's motives, feasibility of preserving parent-child relationships, and any prior agreements regarding relocation.
What happens if I move without court permission?
Relocating without consent or court approval can result in contempt of court, immediate return of the child, loss of decision-making authority, reduced parenting time, attorney fee sanctions, and potential criminal charges for custodial interference under 720 ILCS 5/10-5.
Written by Jonathan D. Steele
Chicago divorce attorney with cybersecurity certifications (Security+, ISC2 CC, Google Cybersecurity Professional Certificate). Illinois Super Lawyers Rising Star 2016-2025.
Free Case AssessmentFor more insights, read our Divorce Decoded blog.