How to Win Your Child Relocation Case: Proven...

Summary

Case Summary: In re Marriage of Taylor C., 2025 IL App (4th) 250061-U - Here is a two-sentence summary of the article: In Illinois, child relocation cases are decided based on specific factors outlined in Section 609.2(g) of the state's family code, which courts weigh to determine whether it is in the best interest of the children to relocate. To win a child relocation case, parents must build a strong case with concrete evidence, including employment documentation, housing arrangements, and proposed parenting schedules, and demonstrate that the benefits of relocation outweigh the potential harm to established parent-child contact.

Meta Description: Struggling with an Illinois child relocation dispute? Learn the exact factors courts weigh and strategies that win. Protect your parental rights today.

Alternative Titles:

How to Win Your Child Relocation Case: Proven Strategies from Illinois Courts
What Every Illinois Parent Needs to Know About Child Relocation Laws
7 Critical Facts About Child Relocation Petitions in Illinois

What You Need to Know About Child Relocation in Illinois

The Fourth District just handed Illinois family law practitioners a masterclass. Child relocation petitions live or die on preparation—not aspiration. The opposing counsel already knows this.

In re Marriage of Taylor C., 2025 IL App (4th) 250061-U, isn't precedential. But don't dismiss it. This Rule 23 order is a blueprint. It shows exactly how trial courts dissect child relocation petitions under 750 ILCS 5/609.2(g). It also reveals why appellate courts refuse to second-guess them.

Your client wants to relocate with the children to South Carolina? Fine. But the judge knows the difference. A child relocation petition built on evidence wins. One built on hope loses. Taylor C. proves it.

Illinois Law on Child Relocation: The Basics

Mother sought to relocate two children from Macomb, Illinois, to Greenville, South Carolina. The trial court denied her child relocation petition. It conducted the full statutory analysis under Section 609.2(g). Mother appealed. She argued the findings were against the manifest weight of the evidence.

The Fourth District affirmed. Decisively.

Here's what the appellate court found persuasive in the child relocation analysis:

The children were thriving in their current environment. They had strong relationships with father and paternal family.
Remote contact couldn't substitute for regular in-person parenting time. Video calls and texts aren't enough.
Mother had unilaterally changed the children's schooling to homeschooling. She did this without court modification.
The proposed schedule would materially reduce father-child contact. Both frequency and quality would suffer.
Questions existed about the new household's stability. The court also questioned the motives behind the proposed move.

The court didn't need to find bad faith. It simply found the benefits didn't outweigh the harm to established parent-child contact.

The Legal Framework: Section 609.2(g) Is a Battlefield

Illinois child relocation law requires courts to weigh multiple factors. These apply when a parent seeks to move children more than 25 miles in metro areas. For most of Illinois, the threshold is 50 miles. The statute lists specific considerations:

The circumstances and reasons for the proposed child relocation
The reasons why a parent objects to the relocation
The history and quality of each parent's relationship with the child
The child's need for stability with both parents
The impact on the child's physical, educational, and emotional development
Whether meaningful contact can be preserved through modified parenting time
The child's wishes, considering age and maturity

The burden of proof rests on the relocating parent. Taylor C. made this clear. Trial courts have broad discretion in weighing these factors. Appellate courts won't disturb findings unless they're against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Translation: If your client loses at trial, the appeal is an uphill battle in a blizzard.

Real Cases: How Child Relocation Plays Out in Illinois Courts

Case Example from Taylor C.: Mother sought relocation to South Carolina for employment and family support. Father opposed, citing his established relationship and regular parenting time. The court found the children were thriving locally. It denied the child relocation petition. The appellate court affirmed, emphasizing that virtual contact cannot replace physical presence.

Key Outcome: The relocating parent's burden requires concrete evidence. Vague assertions about "better opportunities" fail under judicial scrutiny.

Your Step-by-Step Action Plan

Immediate action: Gather all documentation of your current parenting arrangement. Include school records, medical appointments, and extracurricular activities.
Within 48 hours: Secure concrete evidence for your position. If seeking child relocation, obtain employment offers in writing. If opposing, document your involvement in the children's daily lives.
Before your next court date: Prepare a detailed proposed parenting schedule. Address transportation logistics, cost-sharing, and how meaningful contact will be preserved after any relocation.

Common Mistakes That Cost Clients Their Child Relocation Case

Mistake #1: Filing a child relocation petition without concrete employment documentation. Why it matters: Courts view "possibilities" as speculation. You need signed offers or confirmed positions.
Mistake #2: Proposing a parenting schedule that transforms the other parent into a "vacation host." Why it matters: Extended summer visits don't equal regular, meaningful contact. Courts reject these proposals.
Mistake #3: Making unilateral parenting decisions before filing. Why it matters: In Taylor C., mother's decision to homeschool without court approval damaged her credibility. Every unauthorized change becomes evidence against you.

Strategies for Parents Seeking Child Relocation

Build your case with surgical precision. The trial court in Taylor C. scrutinized everything. Employment stability. Housing arrangements. School quality comparisons. The proposed parenting schedule. Vague assertions won't survive cross-examination.

Document everything before filing. School performance data. Comparative community resources. Concrete employment offers—not "possibilities." Housing that's already secured. The court wants proof you've done the work.

Your proposed parenting plan must preserve meaningful contact. If your schedule transforms a co-parent into a vacation host, the court will notice. Propose realistic transportation logistics. Include cost-sharing arrangements. Demonstrate you've thought through the impact on the children's relationship with the other parent.

Anticipate the credibility attack. If your client has compliance issues, address them proactively. Document cooperation. Show good faith. Opposing counsel will find every instance where your client acted without notice or approval.

Strategies for Parents Opposing Child Relocation

Your relationship with the children is your strongest asset. The Fourth District emphasized the "strong, close relationship" between father and children. Document it. Quantify it. Show what will be lost if the child relocation is granted.

Attack the stability narrative. Questions about the new household's stability mattered in Taylor C. Job instability. Housing uncertainty. Family dynamics that raise concerns. Develop these red flags with evidence.

Remote contact is not equivalent contact. The court explicitly found that video calls cannot substitute for regular in-person parenting time. Make this argument forcefully. Children need physical presence, not pixels.

Expose the real motive. Courts consider why a parent wants to relocate. Is it for genuine opportunity? Or to limit the other parent's access? Make that case with evidence—not accusations.

Cybersecurity Considerations for Child Relocation Cases

In high-stakes child relocation cases, digital evidence is increasingly decisive. Text messages showing cooperation or obstruction matter. Social media posts reveal the real timeline of a new relationship or job search. Email chains document notice—or lack thereof—about major parenting decisions.

Assume every text, email, and social media post is a potential exhibit. Because it is.

If your client has been sloppy with digital communications, that evidence will surface in discovery. Address it early. Document it properly. If the opposing party has been negligent with their own communications, that's leverage you should exploit.

Why Trial Preparation Is Everything in Child Relocation Cases

The appellate court in Taylor C. applied the manifest weight of the evidence standard. This is the most deferential standard of review. The appellate court won't substitute its judgment for the trial court's. It will only reverse if the opposite conclusion is clearly evident.

The critical insight: You win or lose Illinois child relocation cases at trial. The appeal is damage control, not a second chance. If your evidence is thin, your witnesses aren't credible, or your proposed plan doesn't address the court's concerns, no appellate argument will save you.

Prepare accordingly. Treat every child relocation petition as trial-ready from day one.

The Bottom Line on Illinois Child Relocation Law

In re Marriage of Taylor C. isn't binding precedent. But it's instructive for anyone navigating Illinois child relocation law. It shows how courts apply Section 609.2(g). It reveals what evidence they find persuasive. It demonstrates how much deference appellate courts give to trial findings.

If you're seeking child relocation, your petition must be built on concrete evidence. You need realistic proposals and documented good faith. If you're defending against relocation, emphasize the established parent-child relationship. Highlight the inadequacy of remote contact. Expose any instability in the proposed arrangement.

The judge knows the difference between preparation and improvisation. Taylor C. shows what happens when they meet in an Illinois courtroom.

Aspiration loses.

Facing a child relocation dispute—whether you're seeking to move or fighting to keep your children in Illinois? These cases are won on preparation, evidence, and strategy executed months before trial. Contact a family law attorney who specializes in child relocation to build a case that survives judicial scrutiny—because opposing counsel is already preparing theirs.

Full Opinion (PDF): Download the full opinion

Frequently Asked Questions