In re Marriage of Folley, 2024 IL App (4th) 240083-U.pdf

In re Marriage of Folley, 2024 IL App (4th) 240083-U.pdf

Summary

Case Summary: In re Marriage of Folley, 2024 IL App (4th) 240083-U.pdf - In a lengthy marriage where the wife was granted permanent spousal maintenance, the husband's retirement prompted a reduction in maintenance payments, but the court declined to eliminate them entirely. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision to set maintenance at $14,000 per month, considering the husband's ability to pay and the wife's limited earning potential due to her role in raising their nine children.

Court Reduces but Declines to Eliminate Spousal Maintenance in Lengthy Marriage

The Illinois Appellate Court recently reviewed a spousal maintenance modification in the case of In re Marriage of Anne E.L. Folley and Gregory F. Folley. The couple had been married for 28 years before divorcing, and Anne had been granted permanent maintenance of $20,000 per month. However, when Gregory took an early retirement, he petitioned to have the maintenance reduced to zero, which the trial court granted.

Anne appealed the decision, arguing that completely eliminating the maintenance was an abuse of the court's discretion. The appellate court agreed, finding that while a reduction may have been warranted due to Gregory's change in financial circumstances, a total elimination was not appropriate. The court remanded the case back to the trial court to recalculate the maintenance based on Gregory's current ability to pay, as well as to determine any arrears that may have accrued.

Trial Court Sets Maintenance at $14,000 Per Month on Remand

On remand, the trial court reviewed the evidence and set the new spousal maintenance amount at $14,000 per month. Gregory, unsatisfied with this figure, appealed the decision once again. He argued that the amount was excessive and that the trial court had not followed the appellate court's instructions in recalculating the maintenance.

The appellate court, however, disagreed with Gregory's arguments. They found that the $14,000 monthly maintenance was reasonable, given several key factors in the case. First, the court noted that Gregory had substantial assets and a clear ability to pay the maintenance, even in retirement. Second, the court emphasized the length of the marriage and Anne's significant role in raising the couple's nine children, which had limited her own earning potential over the years.

Court Affirms Maintenance Amount, Correcting Only a Typographical Error

In reviewing the trial court's decision, the appellate court found no merit in Gregory's objections to the maintenance amount. They did, however, identify a minor typographical error in the trial court's order, which they corrected. Apart from this correction, the appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision in its entirety.

This case serves as an important reminder that while courts may modify spousal maintenance when circumstances change, such as a paying spouse's retirement, a complete elimination of maintenance is rarely appropriate in cases involving lengthy marriages and significant discrepancies in earning potential. The court must carefully balance the needs of the receiving spouse with the ability of the paying spouse to provide support, taking into account factors such as the length of the marriage, each spouse's contributions to the family, and their respective financial situations.

If you are considering a divorce or are currently involved in spousal maintenance proceedings, it is crucial to work with an experienced family law attorney who can help you navigate the complex legal issues involved and advocate for your rights and interests throughout the process. With skilled legal guidance, you can work towards a fair and equitable resolution that protects your financial future and allows you to move forward with your life after divorce.

References

Full Opinion (PDF): Download the full opinion

For more insights, read our Divorce Decoded blog.