In re Marriage of Dahm-Shell, 2024 IL App (5th) 230529-U.pdf

Summary

Case Summary: In re Marriage of Dahm-Shell, 2024 IL App (5th) 230529-U.pdf - The Illinois Appellate Court case In re Marriage of Dahm-Schell highlights the complex legal disputes that can persist long after a divorce is finalized, particularly regarding child support calculations and division of debts. The court ruled that mandatory annual distributions from an inherited IRA should be included as income for determining child support obligations, emphasizing the importance of skilled legal counsel in navigating post-divorce financial entanglements and minimizing the risk of contempt findings.

Illinois Appellate Court Tackles Post-Divorce Disputes Over Child Support and Debt in In re Marriage of Dahm-Schell

When a marriage ends in divorce, disputes between former spouses often continue long after the decree is finalized, especially when it comes to sensitive matters like child support, maintenance payments, and division of debts. The recent Illinois Appellate Court case of In re Marriage of Sandra D. Dahm-Schell and Mark R. Schell exemplifies the complex legal wrangling that can persist for years following a divorce.

Sandra and Mark Schell divorced in October 2016 after a long-term marriage. But that final dissolution proved to be just the beginning of a protracted legal battle over Mark's child support obligations and other financial issues. A series of contentious hearings and motions in the circuit court stretched into early 2022, culminating in the instant appeal decided by the Fifth District Appellate Court in January 2023.

The core dispute in Dahm-Schell centered around the calculation of Mark's income for child support purposes, specifically whether annual mandatory distributions from an inherited Individual Retirement Account (IRA) should be included. The circuit court originally excluded the IRA distributions when setting support in a March 2017 order. However, in an earlier appeal in the same case, the Illinois Supreme Court had ruled that inherited IRAs do count as income for support under 750 ILCS 5/505 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act.

Accordingly, the appellate court in the current decision reversed the circuit court's start date of March 2017 for Mark's support obligation and instead used the October 2016 date of dissolution, with the inherited IRA distributions included in the calculation. The case was remanded back to the circuit court with instructions to determine the exact support amount owed by Mark from October 2016 onward.

Beyond the central child support issue, Dahm-Schell also involved several secondary but still significant financial disputes between Sandra and Mark, demonstrating how far-reaching and long-lasting the consequences of a divorce can be. One point of contention was Sandra's claim for statutory interest on nearly $36,000 in marital credit card debt that Mark had been ordered to pay in the original dissolution judgment.

The circuit court denied Sandra's request to hold Mark in contempt for failing to pay the credit card debt and declined to award interest. The appellate court affirmed this part of the lower court's decision, finding that Sandra had not sufficiently argued the interest issue in her brief. A similar result occurred for another $8,000 debt involving the parties' children's medical expenses, which Mark also had not paid. Again, the circuit court did not grant Sandra's request for contempt or interest, and the appellate court upheld this based on inadequate argument in her brief.

While neither party prevailed outright on the credit card and medical expense issues, the lower court did find both Sandra and Mark in indirect civil contempt at various points for failing to comply with other court orders. For example, Mark was held in contempt for not paying child support, while Sandra was found in contempt for not releasing title to certain vehicles. These additional clashes underscore the degree of animosity and legal conflict that often accompany high-stakes divorces.

For spouses facing situations similar to Dahm-Schell, some key lessons and takeaways emerge:

1. Inherited assets like IRAs can impact support obligations. Based on the Illinois Supreme Court's earlier decision in this case, mandatory annual distributions from an inherited IRA do qualify as income for purposes of calculating child support. An experienced family law attorney can help argue whether a particular asset affects support and by how much.
2. Details matter for statutory interest on divorce debts. Both the circuit court and appellate court denied Sandra's request for interest on the unpaid credit card and medical debts in part because she failed to adequately raise or argue the issue. Even with seemingly straightforward claims, working with counsel to draft clear, well-supported motions and briefs is critical.
3. Compliance is key to avoiding contempt. Mark and Sandra were each held in contempt for violating various provisions of the divorce judgment or related orders. To mitigate the risk of a contempt finding, which can carry financial penalties and even jail time, divorced parties must make every effort to obey court mandates, pay required support/debt, and meet all other obligations.

More broadly, Dahm-Schell illustrates the importance of securing skilled legal counsel not just for the initial divorce proceeding, but for any post-decree disputes that may arise. While ending a marriage always involves some degree of financial entanglement, an experienced attorney can help protect your interests, ensure child support and other amounts are properly calculated, and minimize exposure to contempt or additional litigation. Especially when complex assets like inherited IRAs or substantial debts are at stake, having a knowledgeable advocate is essential.

Ultimately, the goal in high-conflict divorces is to resolve as many issues as cleanly as possible in the original dissolution judgment to avoid drawn-out legal battles later. But as Dahm-Schell shows, even with the most careful planning, disputes over support, maintenance, and debt division may persist long after the divorce is final. Understanding your legal rights and obligations - and having the right family law attorney in your corner - can make all the difference in achieving a fair, durable resolution and moving forward successfully post-divorce.

References

Full Opinion (PDF): Download the full opinion

For more insights, read our Divorce Decoded blog.